KENYAN POLITICS: CYNICISM, INVERTED OPTIMISM AND THE LONGING FOR REAL CHANGE

24 Jul

By Javas Bigambo

Kenya’s general election always fascinates, confounds, stirs and also dissuades most right-thinking observers in a manner that no other country in Africa is capable of doing.

Kenyan Flag: Election times always test our nationhood since independence.

During the peak of each election cycle, the electorate is dazzled with buzzwords of change and associated fantasies, moralist speechifying at campaign rallies against the backdrop of forgotten national and individual histories, and true to their nature, politicians celebrate public ignorance and amnesia like horses consume hay during the drought season.

Seventeen years since the turn of the century, Kenya’s politics is still wretchedly crippled by the vicious pains of tribalism, deplorable plunder and extensive wastage of public resources, favouritism in party primaries and nomination to parliament and county assemblies, reversed wisdom in campaign arguments, and guileful ploys to thwart accountability.

The 2017 election scarcely provides new options or new ideas. What is at play is a battle of craftiness between Jubilee Party and NASA coalition. They are using templates initially used in the 2013 and 20017 elections.

The creepy pursuit of populism and diabolical twists and turns in fleeting accusations and counter-accusations in the political playfield among politicians and political parties, bereft of ideology that must have died soon after the struggle for Kenya’s independence is evident in the lack of requisite ideological drive instrumental for constructive politics.

Javas Bigambo:There is no debate about the need for conscientious debate, and the only debate is about why it is not debatable that we are divided as a nation.

Examining and analyzing all the manifestos presented to voters during the campaign period goes further to depict how not-so-far-apart the political groups are. There are no hard positions on interventions that would create sharp differences to distinguish what each party would offer.

No, I am not pouring cold water on the efforts made by technocrats who penned the manifestos. The trouble is that what the technocrats believe in is not exactly what the political class believes in.

Kenyans are pained by the heightening levels of graft, cronyism, nepotism, flouting of procurement laws and guidelines, disregard for national values domiciled in the Constitution, and thirst for quick riches is the bane of our politics.

Majority of rural populations have refused to interrogate critical issues by examining hard-content with critical depth that would shame the spookiness of the political class.

There has been no critical and sustained insistence by the electorate to have Look at political parties castigate any governor under their party umbrella for misappropriation and plunder of devolved funds.

Look at how no political party is emphasising how local development is going to be exemplified by devolved government, and how they would upscale the oversight roles of County Assemblies to strengthen accountability and oversight at county level.

Look at how no one is immersed in discussing the need to strengthen social audits as a mechanism for enhancing public participation at the two levels of government.

No party is discussing the necessary boost that the Council of Governors needs so as to strengthen direct foreign investment to counties and strengthening of Public Private Partnerships for county governments.

See how no party is discussing the possible and necessary improvements needed to make the Summit and the Intergovernmental Budget and Economic Council more functional, platforms that most Kenyans know little about, and platforms that have left so much to be desired.

The cost of healthcare continues to be unbearable, health and economic welfare insurance remains slippery, and a preserve of the rich, and sustainable development seems to be a good fairytale.

The politicians are obviously on top of their game, and the pliably oblivious electorate is cheering the politicians on and on.

Kenya needs a new awakening. The prisoners of conscience and tolerance must take to the stage and upstage the grandstanding of the status quo, and drive out the agents of political intolerance.

In the 2017 election cycle, the second cycle since the advent of devolution, the only change that is evident is how politicians are deploying technology to throw mud at opponents, and lack of clarity to specific commitments once elected into public office. It is the Kenyans who stand to lose.

Disturbingly, the gushing wound of tribalism and regionalism is what politicians, the self-appointed doctors, have purposefully refused to treat, and are ready to pop the Champaign bottles at the death of the patient, thanks to the wound.

There is no debate about the need for conscientious debate, and the only debate is about why it is not debatable that we are divided as a nation.

The best description of the Kenyan situation is captured by the Irish poet W. B. Yeats in his timeless poem titled The Second Coming, and he states;

Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

An election is supposed to symbolize the light at the end of the tunnel. Sadly, in Kenya, there is no tunnel, and no light. There is no rock bottom that beats having many political leaders with observable conceptual gaps in governance and development.

Political office holders are deemed to be public trustees whose task primarily is to oversee and manage whatever resources entrusted to them as apportioned by the Constitution, and are charitably expected to be do-gooders incapable of pursuing the dusty path of seeking self aggrandizement and personal wealth at the expense of public service.

New levels of political cynicism and idiocy, and class conspiracies continue to be mainstreamed in the Kenyan politics, without foreseeable prospects of clean politics. The brutal tribalism, duplicitous intolerance, and crafty responses to public concerns seem to be the lasting fiber in our body politik.

The voters are admittedly comfortable to choose between degrees of evil. It is like jumping from one hole to the other of similar depth, and imagining that you are kissing the sky.

As we head to the ballot on August 8th 2017, many of us are overwhelmed by the emptiness of many politicians, and as we gasp for air, we are nearly asking for oxygen masks.

Javas Bigambo can be reached through jbigambo@interthoughts.co.ke

One Response to “KENYAN POLITICS: CYNICISM, INVERTED OPTIMISM AND THE LONGING FOR REAL CHANGE”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Longing for real change – hottopics.co.ke - August 1, 2017

    […] via KENYAN POLITICS: CYNICISM, INVERTED OPTIMISM AND THE LONGING FOR REAL CHANGE — Governance, Human R… […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: